The Taylor polynomial of order , centered at and evaluated at , is given by
where is an n-tuple of non-negative integers, and
However, if is in a Sobolev space, may not exist in the usual pointwise sense. We accomplish this by taking an “average” over on a ball.
Definition
Suppose , with , and . The corresponding Taylor polynomial of order of averaged over is defined as
where is defined as , is a ball centered at with radius , and is nonnegative and normalized by . For estimates uniform in the ball, choose from a fixed normalized smooth function supported in the unit ball.
Remark
Such a polynomial is not unique, due to the choice of cut-off function .
Proposition
is a polynomial of degree less than in .
Proof
The definition of makes sense because . If we write
where , and are constants, can be written as
Note
The degree of is at most .
Though we use the assumption that is in a Sobolev space , we can extend the definition of to by integrating by parts:
It is equivalent to if .
Proposition
where and .
Proof
This follows from if we define
Corollary
If is a bounded domain in , then for any nonnegative integer , is a bounded map of into . With the cut-off function fixed, there exists a constant such that for all ,
Proof
This follows from and the fact that both and are bounded.
Proposition
For any such that ,
Proof
It’s easy to verify this proposition for all . The proof is completed via a density argument.
Error Representation
Definition
is star-shaped with respect to the ball if, for all , the closed convex hull of is a subset of .
From now on, we assume that is star-shaped with respect to the ball . Let denote the convex hull of .
The integral form of the Taylor remainder for is given by
Let be a function on . For and , define . Then, we obtain
Hence,
Take , we have . By using the variable substitution in the integral, we obtain
Definition
The -th order remainder term of is given by
Using the definition of and cut-off function, we obtain
Proposition
The remainder satisfies
where , and
The proof is omitted.
Definition
Suppose has diameter and is star-shaped with respect to a ball . Then the chunkiness parameter of is defined as , where is the supremum of the radii of all such balls ,
Corollary
The ball can be chosen so that the function in the remainder representation above satisfies the following estimate:
where is the chunkiness parameter of .
Proof
Choose a ball such that is star-shaped with respect to and the radius of satisfies . Then
Bounds for Riesz Potentials
Lemma
If for and , then
This inequality also holds for if .
Proposition
If and , or and , there exists a constant such that
for all .
Proof
First, we assume that . We can use the pointwise representation of .
The proof can be completed via a density argument.
Lemma
Let for and and let
Then
Lemma (Bramble-Hilbert)
Let be a ball in such that is star-shaped with respect to and such that its radius . Let be the Taylor polynomial of order of averaged over where and . Then
where .
Note
Bramble-Hilbert lemma is an important result for the analysis of the approximation properties of finite elements.
Corollary
Under the assumptions of the Bramble–Hilbert lemma, the following full-norm estimate holds, where denotes the polynomials of total degree at most :
Proof
Choose and sum the seminorm estimates of the Bramble–Hilbert lemma over derivative orders .